Home Page for the TeradataForum
 
 

 

Archives of the TeradataForum





Message Posted: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 @ 12:43:18 GMT





     
  <Prev Next>   <<First <Prev Next> Last>>  




Subj:   Re: Why does a badly skewed join run that badly?
 
From:   Ole Dunweber



Hello Daniel

Thank you for answering - I've almost forgot that I posted the question...

I understand, that volatile tables can cause awfull plans (given that random Amp sampling can't exclude awfull plans).

But I still don't understand, that a badly skewed merge join runs that bad. As I wrote in the question, shouldn't a totally skewed merge join of a volatile table with 500.000 rows on 42 amps amount to a perfectly distributed merge join of a volatile table with 22 million rows?

The runtime certainly indicated, that this was not true in the particular case (the query was almost alone on the system for around 10-20 minutes).

So, maybe it's because the join is an outer join, or maybe because we run priority scheduler - which might get "confused" when a query is heavily skewed?

Anyone else having experienced something similar?


Best Regards

Ole Dunweber
Coop Nordic





     
  <Prev Next>   <<First <Prev Next> Last>>  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  Top Home Join Privacy Feedback  
 
 
Copyright for the TeradataForum (TDATA-L), Manta BlueSky 
Last Modified: 30 Jun 2008