Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 @ 20:09:45 GMT
| Subj: | | Re: VARCHAR vs. CHAR |
| |
| From: | | Doug Cox |
I did a NCR contract where they made me make all the CHAR columns VARCHAR. I don't know if that was a standard but they paid my
check and I did it.
Some would say that VARCHAR is better because even though COMPRESSION doesn't use a lot of CPU it still needs to use a little to
convert back.
It comes down to cardinality when your making your choice. Are there enough unique values to warrent multivalue compression? If
so then do it... If not then VARCHAR.
Save some space... Make a DBA happy... :)
|